London Bombings Reloaded

There are many pieces of the London subway bombings on the Seventh of July that make little sense or stretch credulity close to breaking point. In several interviews after the bombings Peter Power of Visor Consultants stated that a training exercise was running that exactly mirrored that days real events. Interestingly property of the suspects has been found at each location with the property of one man found at two of the locations. In light of the professional way these attacks were carried out it is surprising that they carried any identification at all. Also only an hour or so after the bombings two Reuters employees claim to have witnessed two men being shot by police at Canary Wharf. As only one bomber has been forensically identified the question is was the Canary Wharf incident housekeeping to make sure the bombers didn't embarass anyone by showing up alive?

There have been media reports that timing devices were used which facilitated the near simultaneous explosions. Which then begs the question why would these guys choose to die when they have another 16 bombs stored in their forensically convenient hire car at Luton.
Strangely the bombs found in the Luton car were very unprofessional and that doesn't fit at all with the story that professional military explosives had been used.

There are even more questions that could be asked such as;

•Why did the bus bomber seat himself upstairs in a position that would cause minimal damage?
•Why have the public not seen any CCTV footage of the bombers in position?
•Some witnesses are claiming that no one was sitting where the bomb exploded and that the floor was blown upwards
•Conveniently the CCTV was not working on the bus. Employees of the bus company find this suspicious for these reasons.
•Who warned Netanyahu and why did he get a warning? Click here to see proof of the attempted coverup of this early report.

Tags: Terrorism, London explosions, London